![]() Goffman, Erving (1959): The Presentation of Self in Everyday Life. Wright Mills (1954): Character and Social Structure. 457–498.įrisby, David (1991): ‘Bibliographical Note on Georg Simmel in Translation’. Strauss (1978): ‘Interactionism’, in Tom Bottomore & Robert Nisbet (eds.): A History of Sociological Analysis. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.įisher, Berenice M. London: Macmillan.įine, Gary Alan (ed.) (1995): A Second Chicago School? The Development of a Postwar American Sociology. Qualitative Sociology, 20 (3):369–388.ĭurkheim, Émile (1903/1982): ‘Sociology and the Social Sciences’, in Steven Lukes (ed.): The Rules of Sociological Method and Selected Texts on Sociology and Its Method. (1997): ‘Georg Simmel and Erving Goffman: Legitimators of the Sociological Investigation of Human Experience’. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.ĭavis, Murray S. Symbolic Interaction, 14 (1):1–21.ĭavis, Fred (1992): Fashion, Culture and Identity. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.ĭavis, Fred (1991): ‘Herbert Blumer and the Study of Fashion: A Reminiscence and Critique’. (1965): ‘The Stranger in the Academy’, in Lewis A. The Sociological Quarterly, 10 (3):275–291.īlumer, Herbert (1972): ‘Action Versus Interaction: A Review of Relations in Public’. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.īlumer, Herbert (1969b): ‘Fashion: From Class Differentiation to Collective Selection’. New York: Macmillan.īlumer, Herbert (1969a): Symbolic Interactionism: Perspective and Method. Sills (ed.): International Encyclopedia of the Social Sciences. Harmondsworth: Penguin Books.īlumer, Herbert (1968): ‘Fashion’, in David L. (1966): Invitation to Sociology: A Humanistic Perspective. ![]() ![]() (2003): ‘The Politics of Presentation: Goffman and Total Institutions’. London: Sage Publications.īecker, Howard S. The chapter explores how Simmel accomplished this aim and why he was of such importance to the development of interactionist sociology.Ītkinson, Paul & William Housley (2003): Interactionism. Simmel showed the importance of thinking imaginatively about the constituent elements of social life - he held out the prospect of ‘finding in each of life’s details the totality of its meaning’ (Simmel 1978:55). Interactionists also took from Simmel a model of social being that underlined the importance of knowledge in social life. ![]() The chapter shows how aspects of Simmel’s method and analytic attitude were adapted to the strongly empirical bent of the interactionist perspective. This chapter traces the impact of Simmel’s thinking on the emergence of symbolic interactionism, principally through the sociology of the Chicago School. Simmel brought an original approach to this sociologically unexamined field, addressing the ‘formal’ features of everyday practices that stood apart from the personal propensities, drives and inclinations of individual persons. His novel insight was to direct his analytical gaze to the sociological significance of ordinary experiences and everyday interactions, highlighting features of their details that have since made him a significant forerunner of symbolic interactionism. Georg Simmel was the first great figure in sociology’s classical tradition to set out a distinctive conception of society not as a supra-individual structure but as a series of enabling and constraining interactions and associations among human beings.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
Details
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |